Click for Rick Santorum on other issues.
Providing women and minorities with access to our finest educational research institutions is not only morally correct, it makes good sense.
I know this because I started a program that provides minority students with biomedical research training at Columbia University, and I have witnessed firsthand how dramatically lives can be changed. Diversity not only improves biomedical research training programs but is essential to them, as a cursory look at medical history shows.
Daniel Hale Williamsa graduate of Northwestern University Medical School, was one of the first surgeons to repair a knife wound to the heart. Percy Julianthe second black to be elected to the National Academy of Sciences, was a leader in the synthesis of steroids for treatment of endocrine disorders — but he wasn't allowed into high school because the only one in his hometown of Montgomery was all-white.
Tragically, there are brilliant students who could be the next Drs. Drew, Williams, Julian and Wright, but they may never get a chance to excel.
They come from disadvantaged backgrounds and lack access to resources that could make them competitive with more privileged students. And, importantly, I have found many do not believe they belong on the campuses of the best biomedical research schools.
Efforts by the Trump Justice Department to reduce or eliminate affirmative action hearken back to earlier times, when admission to our best educational institutions was limited to wealthy, Christian whites and mainly men.
Originally published on November 1, pm believe affirmative action programs designed to increase racial diversity "are a good thing," according to a Pew Research Center poll. Both sides in a lawsuit alleging that Harvard University’s affirmative action policies discriminate against Asian American applicants are asking the court to rule in their favor without a trial. Start studying The Supreme Court and Civil Rights. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.
I remember being told in the spring of that a certain outstanding university had enough Jews and I was not wanted. Fortunately, another outstanding college had a more open-minded policy. Learning that it's OK to love science Choked with emotion, I listened to student testimonials this past August at the closing dinner of Columbia University's Summer Program for Underrepresented Students SPURSan affirmative action program designed for students of color or those from disadvantaged backgrounds, or both.
Several students spoke of being homeless, living in shelters but coming in each day to do research in biology laboratories at Columbia. Others mentioned walking home through the South Bronx each night after work because they couldn't afford subway fare.
And others said they hadn't felt welcome on an Ivy League campus before the summer, but now knew they belonged. SPURS enables minority students, most of whom are undergraduates at public colleges or universities, to train in research laboratories at Columbia University for the summer.
I started SPURS 15 years ago to improve diversity in biomedical research, which remains predominantly a whites-only profession run by old, white men. I believe people of color and disadvantaged backgrounds deserve access to the best educational institutions in our country.
Moreover, these students are smart, and we need smart students to pursue careers in biomedical research and to discover new cures for diseases.
The past is still part of our present Many famous institutions of higher learning owe their origins to wealthy slave owners, some of whom are still honored on campuses. Without affirmative action programs, I fear that powerful forces dedicated to preventing people of color from achieving will be largely unopposed.
What is the evidence that affirmative action is required to improve diversity in higher education? Well, the experiment has been done. In the 21 years since Proposition banned affirmative action in California, black student enrollment at UC Berkeley fell from 6.
What is the evidence that students of color do not have access to advanced training in scientific research?
Feb 09, · Affirmative Action Affirmative action was originally designed to help minorities, but women-especially white women-have made the greatest gains as a result of these programs (Gross, ). Affirmative action is a growing argument among our society. Affirmative action came out of a broad national consensus to undo racial segregation. We reached peak desegregation in public elementary and secondary schools in Affirmative Action has turned around to bite some of the people it was designed to benefit.
According to the U. For those persons of color who do receive doctorates in the biomedical sciences, their prospects for competing for federal research funding are dim.
Indeed, in only 1 percent of principal investigators funded by the National Institutes of Health were black and 4 percent were Hispanic, compared to 16 percent Asian and 71 percent white.
Diseases are diverse, and their researchers should be Why is diversity important in biomedical research? There are diseases that afflict populations based on race, gender and socioeconomics.What will replace affirmative action if the Supreme Court kills it?
Ever since conservative courts and voters began trying to eliminate affirmative action in the s, universities have sought.
Affirmative Action Donald Trump on Education: Aug 30, Skeptical of use of affirmative action in college admissions [In a case against Harvard University's affirmative action policy, a Justice Department] brief urged that courts should [reduce] consideration of race in admissions.
Affirmative Action has turned around to bite some of the people it was designed to benefit. Originally published on November 1, pm believe affirmative action programs designed to increase racial diversity "are a good thing," according to a Pew Research Center poll.
What is called “affirmative action” is one of the greatest of contemporary hoaxes. First passed off as compensation for discrimination, then as a means to achieve “diversity,” it is nothing less than official, government-mandated discrimination against lausannecongress2018.coms: Affirmative action, as we had originally envisioned it, as vocalized by President Lyndon Johnson in in his address to Howard University’s graduating class, was specifically designed for.